And there is a more powerful way to relate to them.
That's what I saw after looking at the way we deploy complaint.
Complaint as criticism, complaint as wanting things to improve,
complaint as becoming frustrated that things aren't
better (for want of a better
word)
are all well and good. But
the trouble
with complaint deployed in those ways, is that it comes at a cost.
If the projected end-game is to have things improve and be better,
they should improve and be better without taking more of a toll on
our aliveness
than they already do.
The toll complaint takes on
our aliveness
is that whatever we complain about, defines
(etches
into the rock) an area of life that's incomplete. It re-enforces
something not being "the way it's s'posed to be". What
occurred
for me is it's OK to complain as in offering constructive
suggestions against
a background
of it's (already) OK the way it is. Without
a background
of it's (already) OK the way it is, complaint generates no new
freedoms.
Against
a background
of it's (already) OK the way it is, complaint brings out that which
can be empowered.
"So ..." I asked her, "Does the Dalai Lama complain?". "What
do you mean?" she asked after a moment, taken aback. Now look:
he's the Dalai Lama, yes? And the way we hold the Dalai Lama
is he's in a high place where he doesn't complain. But not only may
that be untrue, it may actually be an insult to him.
Human beings
complain. It's somehow not allowing him to be
human
if you disallow him complaining. What's more likely is he generates
a context of it's (already) OK the way it is, for what
he may complain about, and that renders him able to powerfully make
a difference with what he may complain about.
|