|
Causeway Between Eriskay ("Eric's Isle") And South Uist
("Inner Abode"), Outer Hebrides, Scotland |
|
When I look and flat footed tell the plain truth about it, I see
my attachment to you. Regardless of my
already always
listening about attachment, about being attached, and
especially about the virtue (if you will) of not being
attached to anything (or to any-one for that matter),
I also see being attached to you is a lot of what comprises my
relationship with you. My quandary is as vexing as it is simple: if
I give up being attached to you, will I still be in relationship
with you?
There's no hiding it. It's not in my interest to hide it. What is
in my interest is to take a close look at it. If there's going to
be freedom from being attached to you, the first step is to take a
close look at attachment, to look at my attachment to you, and to
look at whether or not it's OK to be attached to you.
If it turns out it's not OK to be attached to you,
then it's in my interest to look at other possible new ways of
being in relationship with you. Of course one possible new way of
being in relationship with you is to not change anything at all
about being in relationship with you, and simply take the
Zen
approach: be attached to you as long as I'm attached to you, and no
longer be attached to you when I'm no longer attached to you.
I notice how I recoil from even looking at attachment
... at first. Just looking at it brings up all kinds
of issues for me, not the least of which is the aforementioned "if
I give up being attached to you, will I still be in relationship
with you?". And: can attachment and relationship authentically
overlap? Can they coexist? Or does
attachment get in the way of relationship? Does the one negate the
other? And this: should I give up my attachment just because it
is attachment? Giving up attachment just because it is
attachment, may be the way of the sanyassin - but it
may not be the way for me.
|