It's true. You don't even have to understand the language of
engineering to cross the
Golden Gate Bridge.
Neither do you have to understand the physics and the applied
mathematics with which the
Golden Gate Bridge
was built before you
venture across it. No grasp of the terminology of the
Golden Gate Bridge's
building science ("cantilever", "truss", "suspension" etc), while
arguably of interest, is required in order to experience its
magnificence.
What you do need to be clear about, however, is the direction in which
you wish to travel. And if crossing the
Golden Gate Bridge's
facilitates you getting to ie being where you want to be, you'll cross
it - whether or not you have any engineering background or knowledge at
all.
In building the foundation for a future
transformed,
certain words, concepts, and ideas are carefully and pointedly used to
make distinctions. "Reactivation" for example.
"Getting off it" is another example. "Observing from
the stands / playing on the court" yet another. "Inventing
a possibility" still another.
Werner's work
delivers
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
using
language
as the vehicle of delivery. Once the experience of
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
are delivered,
the intention is for
transformation
and for the foundation for a future
transformed,
to disappear into the fabric of Life itself. In the fabric of Life
itself, the
words
ie the
language
through which
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
were delivered, don't translate well ie they don't travel
well. Indeed, arguably they may actually get in the way in the real
world, once
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
have been distinguished and are being lived.
It's not required to speak the
words
and the
language
through which
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
were delivered, for
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
to be lived, any more than it's required to speak the physics and the
applied mathematics with which the
Golden Gate Bridge
was built, before venturing across it.
If
transformation
can be described as the realization of (and here, when I say the
"realization of", I mean the "making real of") what's
possible for being for human beings, then there's no domain anywhere in
Life in which
transformation
isn't readily available. There's no place on
Earth
in which it doesn't belong. There's no people anywhere for whom it
isn't an expression of their essential nature - which means
our essential nature. The quality I call essential
nature is instantly recognizable between human beings. It
doesn't require studying, agreeing, explaining, debating, or arguing.
Neither does it require any particular language set to
capture it. In fact once the language set which was used to bring forth
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
is deployed later in lieu of ordinary conversation between
human beings, that's the exact moment when
rigor
of
Werner's work
is reduced to jargon. It's the exact moment when the
rigor
of
Werner's work
revealing
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed,
becomes less shareable. Jargon is a barrier to listening
transformation.
An engineer sharing the magnificence of the
Golden Gate Bridge
is likely to interest more people in visiting and crossing the
Golden Gate Bridge
than if he shares, in engineering jargon, the physics and the applied
mathematics with which the
Golden Gate Bridge
was built. So it is with
transformation.
The most wonderfully jargonized sharing of
Werner's work
I ever heard (which given its extreme, actually had me smiling broadly)
was this priceless response to a guy asking a recent
graduate.
"What's it like?", to which she replied "Hey! It's a real cool
nothing space, Man!". How much more pragmatic, useful, and
enrolling would her response have been, had she candidly shared a real
life experience in her own words of the oppressive
significance of Life lifting after
transformation?
Share your experience of
transformation
candidly, in your own words. That's what interests people
more, way more, than sharing the processes and the methods ie the
language
through which
transformation
and the foundation for a future
transformed
were delivered in the seminar / presentation in which you experienced
Werner's work.
Learn to differentiate sharing your experience of the
Golden Gate Bridge
from sharing the jargonized language of physics and the applied
mathematics with which the
Golden Gate Bridge
was built. In terms of empowering you to be pragmatic, useful, and
enrolling as you share your experience of the magnificence of the
Golden Gate Bridge,
they're almost irrelevant.