Conversations For Transformation: Essays Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

Conversations For Transformation

Essays By Laurence Platt

Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

And More


GoFundMe

A Discovery Worth Sharing

Cowboy Cottage Cattle Pasture, East Napa, California, USA

February 29, 2024



"Here's my view: there's nothing  I want people to learn from me. It's what you discover for yourself that makes it powerful."
... 
discussing compassion with Dr James Doty at Stanford University between presentations of the Leadership Course in Cancun, Mexico and the Mastery Course in New York
This essay, A Discovery Worth Sharing, is the companion piece to The Storyless You.

I am indebted to Udi Ipalawatte who inspired this conversation.




The entry point for this conversation / distinction / discovery is to inquire into what would be a direct challenge to the ubiquitous "So-and-so is this way" or "So-and-so is that way.". We're prone, especially with regard to what we mostly deem to be others' "negative" traits, to say that so-and-so is  this way, or that so-and-so is  that way, like it's an absolute characteristic embedded in their DNA. We say "Bill is  arrogant", "Sheila is  intolerant.". They are  that way.

Now look (and I really want you to get this): they aren't that way. Really  they aren't. We just say they are. When we start taking a cold, hard, unflinching  look at all the facts of the matter, what starts to come into view is that Bill isn't arrogant like it's an absolute characteristic embedded in his DNA, but that he occurs  (shows up) for me as arrogant. That's one step closer to owning  how Bill is (it's straight out of the Conversations For Transformation playbook: you get to own how others  are). It's akin to realizing I create  Bill as arrogant (yes, I'm the one - not Bill) which is but a short hop away from the colloquial "I make up a story  about Bill being arrogant.". Said another way, how Bill occurs (shows up) for me is (you could say) just a story I make up about him.

We make up stories about people. But it's more than that actually. It's so much more. It's that we make up stories about lots of things. Take music. We say "So-and-so's music is great" - like it's an absolute characteristic embedded in the music. No it's not. It occurs (shows up) for us as great, or not. And when it does, we all know it may not occur (show up) for everyone quite that way. We also make up stories about (for example) wine. We say "So-and-so's wine is great: Robert Parker gave it 99 points out of 100!" like that's an absolute characteristic embedded in the wine. No it's not. It occurs (shows up) for us as great, or not. And it may not occur (show up) for everyone that way. How it occurs (shows up) for us is (you could say) just a story we make up about it.

In the same way as we make up stories about people, music, and wine, and then forget we made up the story and think they are  that way, we also make up stories about art, ignoring the fact (at first) that art occurs (shows up) however it uniquely occurs (shows up) for each one of us. There's no property in any artwork such that it occurs (shows up) for everyone the same way. How it occurs (shows up) for us is (you could say) just a story we make up about it.

From inquiring into all of the above, I've discovered something for myself. It's a discovery worth sharing.

From the Cambridge International Dictionary:

<quote>
Definition
discovery


noun
from the verb discover
to find something for the first time, or something that had not been known before, to realize or learn
<unquote>

We make up stories about people. We make up stories about music. We make up stories about wine. We make up stories about art. And then we forget we made up the stories and think they are  that way. What I've discovered (my discovery worth sharing) is: we make up stories about (wait for it) ... ev  ... ry  ... thing. We make up stories about the way it's s'posed  to be. We make up stories about what's fair (and about what's not fair). We make up stories about what will happen (and about what won't happen). We make up stories to justify what we do. We make up stories to justify what we don't  do. We make up stories about everything. We call that life. And we don't (or we forget to) un-collapse the stories we make up as life, from Life itself. We don't differentiate.

This is a graduate conversation. It's almost too much  to take in, in one breath. We don't really live life at all. We live stories we made up about life  which we've forgotten are just stories we made up up about life. We think our stories about life are real. So watch: if we don't really live life, and instead only live stories we make up about life, wouldn't that in one fell swoop, account for all the unworkability in our lives on Earth, yes? (I told you it was worth sharing).

OK, is this "The Truth"?  Oh, don't make it "The Truth"! That'll ruin it. It's certainly not "The Truth" because I said it. Rather look at it for yourself. See if you can discover it for yourself. See if you can discover for yourself whether or not you don't (or forget to) un-collapse the stories you make up as life, from Life itself. If you can, it may have some power, some utility, some value. Who are you when you don't collapse the stories you make up as life, with Life itself?



Communication Promise E-Mail | Home

© Laurence Platt - 2024 Permission