Conversations For Transformation: Essays Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

Conversations For Transformation

Essays By Laurence Platt

Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

And More


GoFundMe

Making The Old New

Cowboy Cottage, East Napa, California, USA

August 29, 2026



"Transformation reaches back into the past and recontextualizes the past."
... 
"Without integrity nothing works."
... 
"I never worry. God is in his heaven and everything is right with the world - even though it doesn't always look like it."
... Dorothy, 99, improving on Robert Browning
I am indebted to Dorothy who contributed material for this conversation.




It's often said (I have often said) that the past is gone, the future never comes, and we're always living in the present, the eternal always NOW. Upon first glance, that seems quite obvious. There's very little that I can do about the now gone past. Also, while it may be true in some chronological sense that the future never comes, the fact is I can invent possibilities for my life from the future. That's telling evidence that I do have a say over how the future will play out. So it's trivially obvious I have some say over the present, and also trivially obvious I have some say over the future. It's the past over which I seem to have not much say. Indeed, I may have no  say at all over the past. I live my life, meandering through it, with my power over the present and the future.

Life isn't too good, and it's not too bad. Those are good odds in today's world. God is in his heaven and everything is right with the world. And then, just as I accept I can't do anything about the past, and have left it in the past, Werner comes up with this zinger: "Transformation reaches back into the past and recontextualizes  [I love that word] the past.". It violates everything I (thought I) knew about the past ie that it's gone, that there's nothing I can do about it. Now he's telling me that's not true: I can recontextualize  the past. Say whut?!  How so? I can barely contemplate recontextualizing the present and / or the future. Here he's telling me that I can recontextualize the past as well? I'd never considered it before. Now I'm sitting bolt upright and paying attention.

When I was in the past (it's OK to say it that way, standing in the present), I had many different ideas about who (and what)  people are, and why they do what they do, and why they did what they did to me. Without exception, all of my relationships, each one of them, were driven and directed by such ideas. There was never any indication that those ideas may be false or inaccurate in any way. To me, they were "The Truth". Notice it's not bad nor good that we hold our ideas as "The Truth". The trouble arises when we leave no space, no room to entertain the idea that it's we who made them up, that there could be other more workable ways of interpreting the same situations. That's what transformation brings, which in my past was in dire straits and short supply.

Now, standing in the present, I'm inventing the possibility (the privilege  actually) of being transformed. Whatever ran my life in the past, is now no longer running it ie is no longer directing my actions the way it used to. There's now the possibility of noticing missing integrity (both mine and others') in my life back then, and the impact that it unwittingly had on us. There is also the possibility of noticing missing responsibility (both mine and others') in my life back then, and the impact that it unwittingly had on us all. Transformation, in reaching back into the past, recontextualizes the past, restores integrity and also re-accounts for responsibility. Don't fall into the trap of asking how  transformation reaches back into the past. Just let it happen. You'll know when it does. It's no different qualitatively than when it reaches into the present or the future. It's just that we're so blindly accepting of the notion that the past is gone, that the notion of transformation reaching back into the past and recontextualizing it, is ordinarily not on the radar ie it's not on our list of what's possible.

As I stand in the present looking at "the past in the present", I'm looking at the old through new eyes. It's literally making the old new again. You can't do that by changing the past and / or what happened in the past. That option is unavailable, and nor is there a time machine to go back in time, and change the past before  it happens. The path to making the old new again ie the path to transforming / recontextualizing the past, is by inventing a new context for the past in the present, a context where integrity and responsibility are re-instated to center stage, even if the facts of what happened stay the same.



Communication Promise E-Mail | Home

© Laurence Platt - 2026 Permission