Steve Shapiro, a reporter from one of them, the major evening
newspaper,
the
Cape
Argus,
interviewed
us. That
interview
resulted in a comprehensive,
full
page article in the
Cape
Argus'
widely read Saturday weekend edition magazine, which Steve headlined
"somewhere between
east and west".
Its font was
black
lower case, with the letters "e", "s", and "t" in both the
words
"east" and "west" cleverly highlighted in red. That was Steve's
trulyoriginalidea
(my colleagues and I had
nothing
to do with it). The first
time
we
saw
it, slack-jawed, agape, was when the
newspaper's
first print-run hit the streets. That was the kind of astonishingly
generous
coverage Steve and others in the media afforded
us, which virtually guaranteed the acceptance of
Werner's work
in
South Africa,
and the country's subsequent
transformation.
Interimly,
listeningest
as a
discipline,
is a totally valid
view
of it. But ultimately, the notion of
est
as a
discipline,
isn't required. Rather what
est
provided was access to the
context
for alldisciplines.
With that said, if the purpose of the
classicdisciplines
(ie anyclassicdiscipline)
is to release the
being
from self-imposed constraints, then
est
could certainly be accurately described as a
discipline,
differing from others only in its mode of presentation, and body of
distinctions. Explain,
Laurence?
OK.
Many
classicdisciplines
are practiced one-on-one with a
coach
/ facilitator (confession,
therapy
- to name two). Others like
meditation,
are often practiced in solitude. The group format, in which the
discipline
that was
est
was practiced, became
known
as an LGAT (Large Group Awareness
Training).
We didn't assign that term: it was contrived by an armchair critic. It
stuck.
est
was arguably the forerunner of many wannabe LGAT
trainings
which arose thereafter, inspired as they were by it.