After a while I realized there are none. There are no differences between "when you're hungry, eat" and gluttony, and between "when you're tired, sleep" and laziness or slothfulness except for those differences given by the context in which the adage is spoken. Context is decisive. Spoken in a non-rigorous context, "when you're hungry, eat" can sound like it justifies gluttony. Spoken in a non-rigorous context, "when you're tired, sleep" can sound like it justifies laziness or slothfulness. However "when you're hungry, eat; when you're tired, sleep" isn't spoken in just any context. "When you're hungry, eat; when you're tired, sleep" is spoken in a Zen context. This Zen context gives rigor and distinction. It's eating in a context of rigor and distinction which distinguishes "when you're hungry, eat" from mere gluttony. If you sleep in a context of rigor and distinction, that's what distinguishes "when you're tired, sleep" from mere laziness and slothfulness. But what exactly is "sleep in a context of rigor and distinction"? Is it really possible to "sleep in a context of rigor and distinction"? Furthermore, how can "sleep" and "rigor and distinction" even be uttered in the same sentence? Sleep is autonomic. Rigor and distinction are choices. Rigor and distinction are distinctions you can choose to bring to any activity in life including sleep. It's the element of choice which goeswith rigor and distinction (as Alan Watts may have said) when brought to bear on sleep even as it rules autonomically, which transforms sleep. |
Communication Promise | E-Mail | Home |
© Laurence Platt - 2003 through 2016 | Permission |