... | |
<aside>
To be clear, there's also a fourth component to this question: "Which are you: the see-er, the screen, the projector, or the context in which all of the above shows up?" For the purposes of this inquiry, we'll discard the fourth component. Yet it's a given that, over and above and beyond all else, what we are is the context in which all of the above (ie in which all of it) shows up. We'll also discard the first component - as you'll soon see. <un-aside> |
<aside>
Be careful: the idea that it can't be a suitable model for accounting for what I really am, if it doesn't account for me being responsible for what shows up on the screen ie if it doesn't account for being responsible for my own life ie if it doesn't account for being responsible for my experience of life, doesn't derive from some empirically provable fact. Rather, that part of it comes from whether or not I take the stand that any model accounting for what I really am, must of necessity also account for me being responsible for what shows up on the screen ie must also account for me being responsible for my own life ie must also account for being responsible for my experience of life. <un-aside> |
Communication Promise | E-Mail | Home |
© Laurence Platt - 2015 through 2023 | Permission |