Conversations For Transformation: Essays Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

Conversations For Transformation

Essays By Laurence Platt

Inspired By The Ideas Of Werner Erhard

And More


GoFundMe

Not As A Lens Between Me And What I'm Dealing With

Cayetano Creek, Napa Valley, California, USA

February 16, 2024



"I do not put what I think I know from my learning and experience as a lens between me and what I am dealing with. I keep what I know, so to speak, above the space between me and what I am dealing with so that it shines some light on what I am dealing with rather than being a filter."
... 
answering Laurence Platt's question "Do you know everything?" in Questions For A Friend III III (Coming Around Again)
This essay, Not As A Lens Between Me And What I'm Dealing With, is the sixth in the sextology Dealing With:
  1. Dealing With Life: A Tale Of Two Contexts
  2. Dealing With Tribulation
  3. That Which Deals With The Circumstances
  4. Deal With "Your Body" Not "Health Issues"
  5. Momentum: Dealing With It All
  6. Not As A Lens Between Me And What I'm Dealing With
in that order.




Here's a transformative question for you that's worth taking time to consider. It's "What do you do with what you've gotten to know from all your learning and experience?". We do something  with what we've gotten to know - that's for sure. That's not an unusual or a far-fetched idea, in fact it's de rigueur  ie business as usual. Even the most cursory reflection reveals we do something with what we know. But it's more than that actually: it's that we're thrown  to do something with what we know ie it's that it's our nature  to do something with it. What is  unusual, is asking the question  (being in the inquiry) "What do I do with what I've gotten to know from all my learning and experience?". And it's being in this inquiry, that lives outside the realm of business as usual.

Try this on for size (it's one possible answer): for the most part, consider that we use  what we've gotten to know from all our learning and experience. We exploit it. In a word, we apply  it - or (said more rigorously) we're thrown to apply it. We know how to drive a car: we apply it, so we get around; we know how to speak English: we apply it, so we communicate intelligently; we know when to bring an umbrella: we apply it, so we don't get wet. When we apply what we know, it's to have life work better for us. But look: from all our learning and experience, we also think we know how to lose weight; we also think we know from all our learning and experience how to make more money; we also think we know from all our learning and experience how to relax and be less stressed. So even if we apply what we think we know, life doesn't pledge to work any better for us: we're still overweight, underpaid, and stressed out.

It's not necessarily a given  that applying what we know, improves the quality and / or the workability of our lives. Using what we know as a lens through which to appraise what we're dealing with, doesn't necessarily make life work any better - in fact it doesn't necessarily make any difference to the way life works at all. Applying what we've gotten to know and have learned from experience to get along in life (in a word, to survive  in life) may not be the most advantageous way of using what we've gotten to know from all our learning and experience. What then may be a more pragmatic application of that which we know, aside from using it as a lens through which to look at what we're dealing with ie other than as a filter  between us and what we're dealing with?

I consider holding what I know like a light (if you will) above the space between me and what I'm dealing with, so that what I'm dealing with is illuminated by it (literally: I hold it like a light in the dark) rather than filtered through it. That's a new option to consider. Here's another: filtering what I'm dealing with through what I already know, keeps me constrained by what I already know (ie surviving) whereas holding what I already know as a light above the space between me and what I'm dealing with, sheds light newly on what I'm dealing with. Instead of filtering what I'm dealing with through what I already know (ie surviving) it allows me to be free, present, and unfettered while I deal with what I'm dealing with in the light of what I know, yet not filtered through it.

When I put what I think I know from all my learning and experience as a lens between me and what I'm dealing with (ie as a filter through which to look at what I'm dealing with), it not only binds me to what I already know (ie surviving) but it also ensures my certain diminished presence, whereas when I keep what I think I know as a light above the space between me and what I'm dealing with, it allows me to be newly / astutely present to what I'm dealing with.


Postscript:

The presentation, delivery, and style of Not As A Lens Between Me And What I'm Dealing With are all my own work.

The ideas recreated in Not As A Lens Between Me And What I'm Dealing With were first originated, distinguished, and articulated by Werner Erhard answering Laurence Platt's question "Do you know everything?"  in Questions For A Friend III III (Coming Around Again).




Communication Promise E-Mail | Home

© Laurence Platt - 2024 Permission