Lately I've become aware of how arbitrary both domains for
this distinction are. It's not that there's a distinction in
Werner's work
between the
circumstances
ie
what happens,
and
who I really am
as the space in which
what happens,
happens.
It's also not even that there's a distinction in all avenues of
my life
between the
circumstances
ie
what happens,
and
who I really am
as the space in which
what happens,
happens.
To restrict the domain of this particular distinction to either or both
of the above, would unnecessarily curtail not just the
power
of
Werner's work
itself, but it would also unnecessarily curtail my own inherent
power
to make distinctions across the board in life, and thereby curtail my
own inherent
power
to distinguish between
what works
and what doesn't
work.
I'm willing to blur the perimeter of the domain of this distinction.
I'm willing to
open it up
and let it expand so that it includes so much more than merely
Werner's work,
and so much more than merely
my life.
It's become a distinction
which is applicable to
Life itself.
In the totality of it all, it's allwhat happens,
and it all
happens
in the space of
who I really am.
Look:
these are remarkable, awesome,
breakthroughideas.
Their treatises weren't found on your
parents'
bookshelves along with Emily Dickinson's and Robert Frost's. They're
not what you learned in high school - although today there's a great
opportunity for you to learn them in
some colleges.
